Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2004No. 2003-0408PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} In this case, we must determine whether Ohio law precludes, using ballots as evidence of ballot tampering. The appellate court held that the “secret ballot rule” precluded use of the ballots as evidence. We disagree and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

II. Statement of the Case

{¶ 2} Pursuant to R.C. 3509.08, which permits election board members to assist physically infirm electors in voting, the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections sent two board employees, Linda Weaver, a Democrat, and appellee John Jackson, a Republican, to help physically infirm residents at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Rear Door Bookstore v. Tenth District Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Castleberry v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. EmersonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Smith v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. CarswellOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court · 2022

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API