Legal Opinion
Rommell v. Walsh
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 6, 1940PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This case concerns the power of a zoning board of appeals to reverse a decision made with respect to the same property on a former application.
On February 9, 1926, the city of Hartford adopted a zoning ordinance pursuant to legislative authority. Its general purpose is discussed in St. Patrick’s Church Corp. v. Daniels, 113 Conn. 132, 154 Atl. 343, and Thayer v. Board of Appeals, 114 Conn. 15, 157 Atl. 273. It provides for a zoning board of appeals of five members, all defendants in the present action. Section 213, Zoning Ordinance of Hartford, Revision of 1931, reads as follows:
“The Board of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Whittle v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Kamerman v. LeroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- City of Miami v. ZorovichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Kay Construction Co. v. County Council for Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.