Legal Opinion

Varriale v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 11, 2015No. 85/14PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

In this case, we address whether the subsequent use of a suspect’s DNA profile,1 created from a voluntarily provided DNA sample as part of a criminal investigation, implicates Fourth Amendment principles, where a comparison search of the DNA database reveals a match to forensic evidence obtained from the scene of an earlier, unrelated crime. In 2012, Petitioner George Varriale (“Petitioner” or “Varriale”) voluntarily consented to a search of his person, in the form of buccal and penile swabs, for the purpose of furnishing a DNA sample to the Anne Arundel County Police Department during the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robinson, Williams & Spriggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Grimm v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API