Varriale v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.
In this case, we address whether the subsequent use of a suspect’s DNA profile,1 created from a voluntarily provided DNA sample as part of a criminal investigation, implicates Fourth Amendment principles, where a comparison search of the DNA database reveals a match to forensic evidence obtained from the scene of an earlier, unrelated crime. In 2012, Petitioner George Varriale (“Petitioner” or “Varriale”) voluntarily consented to a search of his person, in the form of buccal and penile swabs, for the purpose of furnishing a DNA sample to the Anne Arundel County Police Department during the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robinson, Williams & Spriggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Grimm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Grimm v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.