Legal Opinion

Ainscough v. O'SHAUGHNESSEY

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 52, Calendar 46,729PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

This is a suit in equity for injunctive relief and for rescission of a contract for the purchase of an automobile. In September, 1953, defendant O’Shaughnessey, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was operating an automobile sales agency in the city of Lansing. Plaintiff sought employment by defendant, and to that end interviewed the manager of said agency. The conversation between the parties resulted in the employment of plaintiff and also in his purchase of a DeSoto automobile.

The bill of complaint filed in the cause averred that it was agreed between the parties that plaintiff…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DickMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Mactavish v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Detroit Trust Co. v. Old National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Marshall v. UllmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DBI Investments, LLC v. Paul BlavinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. In RE PEOPLE v. JoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Semaan v. Allied Supermarkets, Inc. (In re Allied Supermarkets, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Connellan v. HimelhochDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Three D Departments, Inc. v. K Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API