Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 9, 1999No. 98-597PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether a defendant may be convicted of committing burglary by remaining on the premises after his privilege to be there has been revoked where the victim testifies that she did not expressly ask the defendant to leave. We conclude that a revocation of the victim’s consent to the defendant’s presence may be inferred from the victim’s resistance to the defendant’s assault on her. Therefore, we affirm the defendant’s conviction of burglary in the first degree. See Iowa Code §§ 713.1, .3 (1997).

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hambrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. State v. HogrefeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. People v. HutchinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Quarles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. State v. HartsfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. In Re the Detention of CraneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API