State v. Hogrefe
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
Sherman Paul Hogrefe appeals from conviction and sentence for theft by deception. See Iowa Code §§ 714.1(3), 714.2(1), and 714.3 (1993). He raises several issues. Because one issue is dispositive of the case, we address it only. That issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to submit the mar-shalling instruction on theft by deception. Because we conclude there was not sufficient evidence to submit the instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Hogrefe is a 1986 graduate of South Dakota State where he majored in agribusiness.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Coker v. Abell-Howe Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Sonnek v. WarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. HeemstraSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State of Iowa v. Max v. ThorndikeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State of Iowa v. Eddie TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State v. LathropSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State of Iowa v. Kent Anthony Tyler IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.