In Re the Detention of Crane
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
STREIT, Justice.
John Crane appeals his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. Crane claims his attorney should have asked for a jury instruction stating he is presumed not to be a sexually violent predator. Because we recently ruled a presumption instruction is not required in chapter 229A proceedings, we affirm. Crane also claims the district court erred when it instructed the jurors they had nothing to do with his confinement or treatment. We find the disputed instruction was not erroneous or misleading.
I.Facts and Prior Proceedings
John Crane has three convictions for assault with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- State v. DaltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- In Re Detention of PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Patchette v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Haman v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- In RE the Detention of Paul Michael Blaise Paul Michael BlaiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- In re the Care & Treatment of OntiberosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- Jenkins v. DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA CENTERSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.