Legal Opinion

People v. Hutchinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1984PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rena K. Uviller, J.

At the conclusion of the evidence at defendant’s trial for burglary and related crimes, he has moved to dismiss the burglary counts on the ground that there was legally insufficient evidence that he had entered or remained unlawfully in the complainant’s apartment. (CPL 290.10.) The motion raises two questions about the meaning of the phrase “enters or remains unlawfully”, contained in the criminal trespass and burglary provisions of the Penal Law. (Penal Law, §§ 140.05, 140.30, 140.00, subd 5.)

The first question, whether entry by trick or fraud…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. CzerminskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. People v. SegalCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
  4. People v. LudloweNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lewis v. FloodNew York Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Delgado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. People v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Ex Parte GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Ray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. State v. MahoeHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API