Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 15, 1979No. NCM 78 1542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROOT, Judge:

At a special court-martial appellant was convicted, in accordance with his pleas, of two periods of unauthorized absence. During the trial before a military judge, he was represented by a civilian counsel and, until appellant waived his further services, by a detailed defense counsel.

Appellant now complains that the failure of the judge to advise him, pursuant to Article 38(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 838(b), of his right to be represented by a military counsel of his choice was prejudicial to his substantial rights. United States v. Donohew, 18 U.S.C.M.A.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. JorgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WagerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. HadleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API