Legal Opinion

United States v. Jorge

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 3, 1975No. 29,478PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ferguson, Senior Judge:

This appellant stands convicted by a special court-martial of unauthorized absence in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. We granted his petition for review to determine whether the military judge erred to his prejudice by failing to advise him of his right to be represented at trial by civilian counsel as required by United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149 (1969).

At the commencement of trial, the uniformed lawyer representing the appellant introduced himself as "individual military counsel” and stated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. CattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  2. United States v. MontoyaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. JerasiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. MooreU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API