Lapique v. Morrison
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. James W. Bartlett, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
This action was commenced by Pierre Agoure, who claimed right to the use of a right of way for road purposes across the land of defendant. By the allegations of the complaint facts are alleged which support both a cause of action to assert the right in the plaintiff to the use of the road, as of necessity, as well as the right by adverse user; at least, such is the general complexion of the allegations contained in the complaint. In the prayer it is demanded that defendant be enjoined from interfering with the plaintiff’s use of the alleged right of way, and also that the interest of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- O'Connor v. FogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Orr v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pugh v. ConwayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Zunino v. GabrielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lord v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.