Legal Opinion
United States v. Goodman
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 8, 2011No. 11-0389/ARPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether the failure of the military judge to advise Appellant of the mistake of fact defense and secure his disclaimer of the defense requires us to set aside his guilty plea. We specified an additional issue, without briefs: Whether the specifications alleging indecent exposure and bigamy under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006), failed to state offenses. We hold that the military judge did not err and Appellant did not raise matters inconsistent with his guilty plea:…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. FoslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. SchweitzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. MoonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. WeeksCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
- United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. GuinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. PassutUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2013
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.