Legal Opinion
Swedlund v. City of Hastings
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1993No. S-91-287PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Eleven landowners appeal a district court for Adams County order finding that an ordinance annexing their property to the City of Hastings (City) is valid and enforceable.
We affirm the order of the district court.
FACTS
On November 14, 1988, the Hastings City Council passed ordinance No. 3088, which annexed an area west of the City. The ordinance contains a single metes and bounds description of the annexed property. The annexed area includes Highland Drive residences, an area of 16 houses where all the appellants, except Blake and Dorothy Mankin, own property; Imperial Village addition, a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wagner v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Johnson v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Regency Homes Ass'n v. EgermayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Village of Niobrara v. TichyNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Elkhorn v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Rosse v. RosseNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- County of Sarpy v. City of GretnaNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
- Cornhusker Public Power District v. City of SchuylerNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.