Legal Opinion
South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Homestake Mining Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1999No. 20813PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] The South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) appeals the order of the trial court affirming an order of the Department of Labor (Department) requiring SIF to pay Homestake Mining Company (Homestake) prejudgment interest on Homestake’s reimbursement claim. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] On September 11, 1996, Home-stake Mining Company filed a claim with the South Dakota Division of Insurance (Division) for reimbursement from the South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund. The claim was denied by the Division on July 8, 1997. The Division concluded that the preexisting condition…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Johnson v. Skelly Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Parsons v. South Dakota Lottery CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Anderson v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Greenwich Hospital v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Homestake Mining Co. v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.