Legal Opinion

Homestake Mining Co. v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. 21977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ACTION

MILLER, Retired Justice,

Acting By Appointment.

[¶ 1.] Homestake Mining Co. appeals from a declaratory judgment holding it was not entitled to reimbursement from the state’s Subsequent Injury Fund for certain workers’ compensation claims. We affirm and hold that SDCL 62-4-34.1 provided the applicable statute of limitations for Homestake to file its claims against the Fund and that a subsequent amendment of SDCL 62-4-34.7 could not revive Home-stake’s claims after the limitations period had expired and Homestake had failed to *614file its claims within that limitations period.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. SER Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Hon. David W. Nibert and SER Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Hon. James H. Young, Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Thach v. Tiger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API