Homestake Mining Co. v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ACTION
MILLER, Retired Justice,
Acting By Appointment.
[¶ 1.] Homestake Mining Co. appeals from a declaratory judgment holding it was not entitled to reimbursement from the state’s Subsequent Injury Fund for certain workers’ compensation claims. We affirm and hold that SDCL 62-4-34.1 provided the applicable statute of limitations for Homestake to file its claims against the Fund and that a subsequent amendment of SDCL 62-4-34.7 could not revive Home-stake’s claims after the limitations period had expired and Homestake had failed to *614file its claims within that limitations period.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In re the Termination of Parental Rights over D.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Dahn v. TrownsellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Lyons v. Lederle LaboratoriesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- O'neill v. O'neillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- SER Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Hon. David W. Nibert and SER Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Hon. James H. Young, Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Thach v. Tiger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.