Legal Opinion

George v. Associated Stationers

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 3, 1996No. 1:95CV1345PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HEMANN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case was filed pursuant to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq. (the “Act”). Pending are cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The legal issues raised by the parties’ motions are discrete: 1) is chicken pox a “serious illness” within the Act, and 2) is defendants’ attendance policy a violation of the Act on its face or as applied? For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted and defendant’s motion is overruled.

I

The undisputed facts are as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brannon v. OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995
  2. Hendry v. GTE North, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
  3. Seidle v. Provident Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones v. Denver Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Stubl v. T.A. Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Olsen v. Ohio Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. Vivian Martyszenko v. Safeway, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Dennis DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Carpenter v. Refrigeration Sales Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API