Legal Opinion
Raville v. Singh
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1994No. B068275PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
In this appeal, we reverse a judgment signed by a supervising judge after the trial judge died without issuing a statement of decision, Code of Civil Procedure section 632 1 requires the trial judge to, at a minimum, issue a statement of decision in order to empower a supervising judge to sign a judgment for an incapacitated trial judge pursuant to section 635.
Facts
On June 1, 1987, respondent Ron Raville filed a complaint against defendant, cross-complainant and respondent Lance Gorze and defendant, cross-defendant and appellant Harbans Singh. The case came to trial before…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re the Marriage of DittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Armstrong v. PicquelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Leiserson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Swift v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wurzl v. HollowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Richard B.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Heenan v. SobatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Karlsen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Heenan v. SobatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.