Legal Opinion
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Richard B.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2012No. B227849PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
INTRODUCTION
The appellant, Richard B. (Richard),1 challenges the trial court’s order of August 24, 2010, which (1) denied his request to be recognized as the presumed father2 of Cheyenne B. (Cheyenne) and (2) found that Dennis M. (Dennis) was her presumed father.3 The findings of that order formed the basis for the September 29, 2010 judgment declaring Cheyenne and D.H.4 (D.H.) to be dependents of the court and permanently placing them with Dennis. Richard asserts that his August 20, 2009 judgment regarding parental obligations is a judgment establishing his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Caldwell v. Paramount Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Irene V.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- S.Y. v. S.B.California Court of Appeal · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Santa Clara County Department of Family and Childrren's Services v. J.J.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- W.S. v. S.T., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Department of Children & Family Services v. John B.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. E.C.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. C.E. (In re C.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.