Legal Opinion
Metz v. Wyeth LLC
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 18, 2011No. Case No. 8:10-CV-2658-T-27AEPPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants Wyeth LLC and Schwarz Pharma, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 55). Upon consideration, Defendants Wyeth LLC and Schwarz Pharma, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 55) is GRANTED.
Introduction
Plaintiffs, Barbara Metz and Donald Metz, filed this action against Wyeth LLC (“Wyeth”), Schwarz Pharma, Inc. (“Schwarz”) (collectively, the “Brand Defendants”) and Actavis Elizabeth, LLC d/b/a Purepac Pharmaceuticals (“Actavis”) for injuries arising from the use of metoclopramide, marketed by Wyeth and Schwarz under the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Liggett Group, Inc. v. EngleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrea Guarino v. Wyeth, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Dolin v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Gardley-Starks v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
- Esposito v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.