Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Burnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1909No. Civ. No. 546PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjoining tracts of land situate in Fresno county. As appurtenant to his land, plaintiff claims to have a right of way across the land of defendant for the purpose of maintaining a ditch to carry water from the main ditch of the Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company to the lands of plaintiff for irrigating purposes, and brought this action to obtain a judgment establishing such right, and restraining defendant from interfering with plaintiff in repairing said ditch. Defendant denied the right of plaintiff, and by a cross-complaint sought damages caused by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Quinlan v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hayes v. FineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jones v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pendola v. RammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hall v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Edgar v. PensingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Husain v. California Pacific BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API