Legal Opinion

Hall v. Webb

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1924No. Civ. No. 4355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Gathered from the record, the facts of this controversy may be summarized as follows: The plaintiffs (known as the West-enders) ^,re the owners of certain lands riparian to the San Pasqual River. The defendants are also riparian owners of lands located higher on the said river, and there are yet other owners of land (known as the Eastenders) located still nearer the source of the stream. In 1898 the West-enders. brought a suit against the East-enders with reference to the use of the waters of said stream, with a result that a compromise judgment was rendered whereby the use of 2,000 inches of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Walter A. Wood Reaping & Mowing Machine Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. FEI Enterprises Inc. v. YoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Anderson v. Sheehan-Bartling, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Anderson v. Sheehan-Bartling, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API