Sidebotham v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Petitioners question the validity of an order made by the respondent court in a proceeding for settlement of a proposed statement for use upon petitioners’ *626appeal from a judgment rendered in an action tried in the respondent court.
Petitioners-appellants ’ proposed statement was in two parts: One part was in substance a clerk’s transcript; the other a condensed narrative of the oral proceedings had upon the trial.
The respondent real parties in interest proposed no amendments to the first part of appellants’ statement. They made numerous objections to appellants’ statement of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Western States Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Keller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Nichols v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Mooney v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Mooney v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016