Legal Opinion

Marks v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2002No. S085224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Appeal from a judgment of death is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) If, as in most cases, the defendant is indigent, this court will appoint counsel to prosecute the appeal. (Id., § 1240.1.) Until 1998, appointed counsel’s obligations also included “a duty to investigate factual and legal grounds for the filing of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.” (Cal. Supreme Ct., Policies Regarding Cases Arising from Judgments of Death, policy 3, former std. 1-1; see In re Sanders (1999) 21 Cal.4th 697, 717-718 [87 Cal.Rptr.2d 899, 981 P.2d 1038]; see also In re Anderson…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. VirgilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API