Marks v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
Appeal from a judgment of death is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) If, as in most cases, the defendant is indigent, this court will appoint counsel to prosecute the appeal. (Id., § 1240.1.) Until 1998, appointed counsel’s obligations also included “a duty to investigate factual and legal grounds for the filing of a petition for writ of habeas corpus.” (Cal. Supreme Ct., Policies Regarding Cases Arising from Judgments of Death, policy 3, former std. 1-1; see In re Sanders (1999) 21 Cal.4th 697, 717-718 [87 Cal.Rptr.2d 899, 981 P.2d 1038]; see also In re Anderson…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. VirgilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.