Legal Opinion

Vitagraph, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1938No. 5996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

From an order of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation plaintiff brought certiorari, presenting the single question: Was the accident one arising “out of, or in the course of employment” ? Defendant, Pierre Oliver Perry, had a home approximately two miles southeast from Sugar House in Salt Lake County. He was employed at times, on assignment, by the petitioner as a checker at mov ing picture houses in Salt Lake City and vicinity where and when Vitagraph Pictures were being shown on percentage basis. He was not regularly employed and received no fixed weekly wage.

He…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. GintertOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Ocean Acc. Etc. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. of Nebraska v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Industrial Commission v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jex v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Murphy v. Flint Bd. of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Bailey v. Utah State Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Mandell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  5. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API