Legal Opinion
Graham v. State Board of Examiners
Montana Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1945No. 8586PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION:
2Per curiam
This action is brought against the Board of Examiners of the State of Montana and the members thereof. The prayer of the complaint is for a declaratory judgment of this court declaring and determining that House Bill No. 45, [Chapter 2] Session Laws of Montana, 1945, is a valid legislative enactment and declaring the duties of the defendants under said bill authorizing and requiring the defendants to employ an architect or architects for the purpose of preparing plans and specifications as in said Act provided.
House bill No. 45, as duly passed by the 29th Legislative Assembly of the…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Hill v. RaeMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Fergus v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Crick v. RashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- In re Appropriations by General AssemblySupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Cottingham v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Woodahl v. StraubMontana Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. Hardy v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Plath v. Hi-Ball Contractors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1961
- City of St. Louis v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.