Legal Opinion

In re Appropriations by General Assembly

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1889PublishedCited by 50 opinions

The opinion is in response to the following communication and interrogatories from the governor, to which were attached exhibits coiitaining hundreds of different items: “To the Honorable the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado: •“Sirs: Doubts have been suggested, both among the members of the executive department of this state, whose duty it is to act in relation to the matters hereinafter mentioned, and among many citizens and tax-payers of the state, whether the…

Read the full summary

The opinion is in response to the following communication and interrogatories from the governor, to which were attached exhibits coiitaining hundreds of different items: “To the Honorable the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado: •“Sirs: Doubts have been suggested, both among the members of the executive department of this state, whose duty it is to act in relation to the matters hereinafter mentioned, and among many citizens and tax-payers of the state, whether the aggregate of the appropriations made by the seventh general assembly is in excess of the limitation fixed by the constitution…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott

The determination by this court of the various questions propounded in this case must affect in a large degree many private as well as public interests. We deem it proper, therefore, at the outset, to call attention to the construction already given to section 3, article 6, constitution, in relation to questions submitted by the executive and the general assembly. See opinion, per curiam, in 9 Colo. 620, concerning irrigation; also opinion by Chief Justice Helm, filed April 5, 1889, in response to a resolution requesting a construction of the provisions of senate bill No. 65, 12 Colo. .466.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  2. Wilson v. VoightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. People ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Williams v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Henderson v. BurdickWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Leckenby v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. In re Speakership of the House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API