Legal Opinion

United States v. Randy W. Blankenship

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 26, 2004No. 01-17064PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

The defendants in this case — Randy Blankenship, Tammy Blankenship, Howard Glover, and Tarand Transport, Inc.— were convicted of a variety of federal offenses stemming from an affirmative action fraud scheme they perpetrated regarding federally funded road construction projects. We conclude that the district court acted properly in conducting a joint trial of the defendants and that the defendants did not suffer undue prejudice due to the prosecution’s closing arguments to the jury. However, we reverse the Blank-enships’ convictions for money laundering and most of…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. In Re American Airlines, Inc., Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2005
  4. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. JayyousiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API