Legal Opinion
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1986No. C3-85-1744PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This appeal is from an order granting a temporary injunction against appellants Thomas Hefty and his company, Metco Mortgage. The injunction enforces a restrictive covenant in Hefty’s employment contract with respondent Rosewood Mortgage. It prohibits Hefty and Metco from doing business with five institutions which Hefty dealt with while at Rosewood. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Thomas Hefty joined respondent Rosewood in October of 1981 to establish a mortgage banking operation for the parent Rosewood Corporation. Hefty at that time had over ten years’ experience in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ormco Corp. v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Webb Publishing Co. v. FosshageCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Life Time Fitness, Inc. v. DeCellesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- City of St. Paul v. CarloneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Itasca Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.