Newtown Village Partnership v. Kimmel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This appeal is from the May 8, 1992 order sustaining appellee William Meritz’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellants’ complaint against additional defendant William L. Meritz. 1 Appellants, Martin Kimmel and Sherry Bogarde, raise one issue on appeal:
Are the Defendants in a mortgage foreclosure action brought by Plaintiff Partnership prohibited from joining a principal of the Partnership and an Additional Defendant upon Defendants’ allegations of fraud, deceit and misrepresentations in the mortgage inducement which are essentially the same as those averred in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Insilco Corp. v. RayburnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Signal Consumer Discount Co. v. BabuscioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Groff v. Pete Kingsley Building, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Lamoree v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Alexander v. Mastercraft Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
3Cited by16 opinions
- JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. MurraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Rearick v. Elderton State BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Montgomery County ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Morrisville Hampton Village Realty Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.