Legal Opinion

Groff v. Pete Kingsley Building, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1988No. 02715PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County dismissing appellant’s amended complaint on appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Appellants, Theodore and Denise Groff, purchased a tract of land in Lancaster County through the agent of a land developer. Thereafter, in October of 1982, appellants contracted in writing with appellee, Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc., to construct a new house on the tract of land. Appellants took possession of the completed house on February 1, 1983.

On September 3, 1986, appellants instituted suit against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. McDonald v. MianeckiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. FrandsenUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  3. Kosor v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Vasilis v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Hite v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API