Legal Opinion
Insilco Corp. v. Rayburn
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 1988No. 402 and 797PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, Judge:
These are consolidated appeals from a summary judgment in mortgage foreclosure and from an order granting two stays of execution on the mortgage foreclosure judgment pending resolution of the appeal from the summary judgment in mortgage foreclosure. We quash the appeal from the summary judgment filed at No. 402 Pittsburgh 1987, and we affirm the order granting the stays of execution appealed at No. 797 Pittsburgh 1987.
On January 9, 1974, Joel and Judy Rayburn (Rayburns) executed an agreement with Miles Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc., the predecessor corporation of Insilco…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re Upset Sale, Tax Cl. Bureau of BerksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- MECO REALTY CO. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- First Seneca Bank v. Greenville Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kretschman v. StollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Nicholas, J. v. Hofmann, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Rearick v. Elderton State BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Newtown Village Partnership v. KimmelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Stuart v. Decision One Mortgage Co., LLC (In Re Stuart)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Pasqualis-PolitiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.