Legal Opinion

Bishop v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1964No. 175-60PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is a suit for the value of plaintiff’s pos-sessory interest under a contract which expired by its own terms, wherein the Secretary of the Interior declined to renew plaintiff’s right to operate two lodges in the Rocky Mountain National Park. The case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastín G. White, pursuant to Rule 45, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law. The Commissioner has done so in a report filed November 16,1962.

Since the Commissioner has found that the plaintiff has not affirmatively established, in the circumstances…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Schoeffel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  3. Lemmons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API