California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKashiwa, Judge
Plaintiff, the State of California, Department of Transportation, in this case asserts a claim founded upon an express contract with the United States under the Federal-Aid Highways Act (23 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. (1970)). Founding its claim under 23 U.S.C. § 106(a) (1970), plaintiff contends *332that it is entitled to the sum of $158,941.68, which represents the additional costs incurred by the State highway department in acquiring the right of way for an interstate highway. This sum represents the difference between replacement cost which the State' paid for property and fair market value on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Roger Aarons and Robert SwannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. ConnorDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1966
- Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul, a Public Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- State of Nebraska, Department of Roads v. Norbert T. Tiemann, Federal Highway AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- California ex rel. Department of Transportation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- City of Fulton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- New Mexico ex rel. New Mexico State Highway Department v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981