Legal Opinion

American MacHine & Foundry Company v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 18, 1959No. 12924_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, owner of the Bandel patent application on a tobacco sheet, brought a patent interference proceeding against appellee, owner of the Samfield, et al. patent No. 2,708,175. The Patent Office awarded priority of invention to Sam-field, et al. In an attempt to reverse that award appellant filed suit in the district court under 35 U.S.C.A. § 146 (1952). Chief Judge Forman in the district court held that appellant “ * * * failed to prove that Dr. Bandel achieved a reduction to practice of a composition of matter prior to a similar reduction for which application for a patent was filed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  4. Bowers v. ValleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  5. JOHN BLUE COMPANY v. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones Knitting Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Cleeton v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  4. Application of David BandelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API