Legal Opinion
American MacHine & Foundry Co. v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 20, 1959No. Civ. A. 1032-57PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, Chief Judge.
This action is brought by the American Machine & Foundry Company against Liggett & Myers, both New Jersey corporations, hereinafter called AMF and L&M respectively, to obtain a judgment pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146 entitling AMF to a patent now held by L&M. An Interference proceeding has been decided adversely to AMF by the Board of Patent Interference Examiners, hereinafter called the Board, within 60 days of the filing of this suit, and no appeal is pending before the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Jurisdiction and venue are had under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338 (a) and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones Knitting Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- American MacHine & Foundry Company v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Cleeton v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.