Legal Opinion
Cartledge v. Sinclair Refining Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 1, 1955No. 10324PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Justice.
This suit was instituted by appellants, W. R. Cartledge and his son, Eugene H. Cart-ledge, against Sinclair Refining Company to cancel a lease covering Lot 22, Outlot 22, Division D, Horst Addition to the City of Austin, executed October 14, 1947, by W. R. Cartledge and' his wife, Mrs. Josephine Cartledge. The primary term of the lease was ten years commencing April 26, 1948. Dependent upon cancellation consequential damages were sought.
The only ground pleaded as a basis for termination of the lease was the failure of Sinclair to pay stipulated rents as due.
Both parties moved…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Caine v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- United States v. SchuermannDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Buffalo Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- BOC Group, Inc. v. Katy National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Cole v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
- Jackson v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
- Buffalo Pipeline Co. v. Bell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.