Legal Opinion
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Schumacher
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 11, 1944No. 22394PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
On December 5, 1943, plaintiff, a corporation doing a large mail order business, filed an amended complaint against twenty defendants, some of whom are railroad carriers and others motor vehicle carriers, seeking damages due to a general stoppage of common carrier transportation to and from plaintiff’s place of business in Oakland, California, during the period from December 4, 1940 to July 26, 1941, alleged to have been caused and participated in concurrently by defendants, contrary to their obligations as common carriers.
To the amended complaint, the defendants (some…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
- Kaus v. HustonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1940
- Banks v. King Features Syndicate, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Schenley Distillers Corporation v. RenkenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1940
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CJ Tagliabue Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- City of Lake Worth v. First Nat. Bank in Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.