Legal Opinion
Barry G. Lew, M.D. v. Kona Hospital
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 13, 1985No. 83-2671PublishedCited by 214 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Barry G. Lew, M.D., appeals a decision of the district court granting sum mary judgment to defendants on his claim of civil rights violations, unfair trade practices, and defamation. In addition, Dr. Lew challenges the district court’s order that he pay costs and attorneys’ fees incurred by defendants in connection with his deposition at which he failed to appear. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment and its award of costs and attorneys’ fees.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Dr. Lew was granted probationary staff privileges in obstetrics and gynecology…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Marc A. Stretten v. Wadsworth Veterans HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by214 opinions
- School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Kaiser Cement Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc., the Howard P. Foley Co., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.