Legal Opinion

Cass v. Ray

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1989No. 88-100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Attorney George Ray, executor of the Estate of Clarence L. Esty (the estate), appeals a decision by the Superior Court (Groff., J.) granting the plaintiff, Hazel Cass (Mrs. Cass), an extension of time in which to file suit against the estate. We hold that the superior court erred in granting Mrs. Cass an extension under RSA 556:28 and therefore reverse and remand.

In 1975, following his wife’s death, Clarence Esty, then 82, asked Mrs. Cass, a 71-year-old widow and long-time friend to Mr. Esty and his wife, to stay with him at his home in Hebron. From 1975 until his death in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  2. Coffey v. BresnahanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Brady v. DuranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Halstead v. MurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Stewart v. FarrelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Koch v. RandallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Skrizowski v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  3. In re Estate of BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. In Re Will and Estate of BourassaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. In re Estate of PrattSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API