Legal Opinion

Halstead v. Murray

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 8, 1988No. 86-296PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The plaintiff, Kirk Halstead, appeals from the denial of his motion to enforce settlement of an agreement entered into between his attorney and the attorney representing the defendant Stewart Murray. The Superior Court (Wyman, J.) approved the report of the Master (Charles T. Gallagher, Esq.) recommending that the agreement be found unenforceable because it failed to comply with the New Hampshire Statute of Frauds. We reverse and remand.

The parties own abutting property on Lake Winnipesaukee in Moultonborough. In April, 1984, the plaintiff filed petitions for declaratory and injunctive relief…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McIsaac v. McMurraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  2. Savage v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Beliveau v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  4. Burtman v. ButmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  5. Manchester Housing Authority v. ZylaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tsiatsios v. TsiatsiosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Poland v. TwomeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Byblos Corp. v. Salem Farm Realty TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Ogden v. GriffithIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Allied Waste North America, Inc. v. Lewis, King, Krieg & Waldrop, P.C.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API