Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1947No. 3693PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

The authorities are divided concerning the liability of an indemnity company that has final control over settlement for negligence in failing to settle a claim when possible to do so within the policy limits. “According to the old majority rule, the insured could recover the excess of a judgment above the policy limits from the insurer, because of its failure to effect a settlement for a smaller sum, only if the company was guilty of actual fraud or bad faith. It should be noted, however, that this bad faith rule is tending to become the minority rule, being displaced by the rule of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Attleboro Mfg. Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Shamblin v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bollinger v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Elmore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API