Koch v. Randall
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendants appeal that portion of the Superior Court’s (Hollman, J.) order which awarded attorney’s fees to the plaintiffs. Harlan Randall was named as a defendant in both equity actions, and Joseph Fostyck was named as a defendant only in the suit by the Town of Winchester. The two cases were consolidated for trial in 1991. We affirm.
Defendant Randall owns land adjacent to plaintiff Larry Koch. Randall’s house sits in the northeast corner of the 7.7 acre lot in question; the remaining acreage is used for agricultural purposes by defendant Fostyck, who leases Randall’s fields to grow…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Maguire v. Merrimack Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Manchester Housing Authority v. ZylaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. CharpentierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Bowers v. WurzburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Harms v. City of SibleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Tetzlaff v. CampSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Town of Boothbay v. JennessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.