Smith v. Municipality of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Rodney Smith was convicted of concealment of merchandise in violation of AMC 8.05.550(B). 1 On appeal Smith argues his conviction should be reversed because the jury was not instructed that in order to convict him the jury had to find proof that he had a specific intent to conceal and a specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the merchandise. We conclude that the ordinance does not require a specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the merchandise. However, we interpret the ordinance as requiring an intent to conceal merchandise. We find that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Jefferson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hugo v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Strane v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011