Legal Opinion
Atterholt v. Herbst
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 2008No. 49A04-0702-CV-106PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Geneva Herbst, the .personal representative of the Estate of Jeffrey A. Herbst (“the Estate”) brought an action seeking excess damages from the Indiana Patient’s Compensation Fund (“the Fund”). The Marion Superior Court granted partial summary judgment and final judgment in favor of the Estate. The Fund appeals and presents two issues for review, which we restate as: whether the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment in favor of the Estate, and whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence proffered by the Fund.
We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
T…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Four Seasons Manufacturing, Inc. v. 1001 Coliseum, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atterholt v. HerbstIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Cutter v. HerbstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cutter v. HerbstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- DiCosola v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003