Legal Opinion

Atterholt v. Herbst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2009No. 49S04-0806-CV-344PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that when a claimant seeks excess damages from the Patient's Compensation Fund after obtaining a judgment or settlement from a health care provider in a medical malpractice case, the Fund may introduce evidence of the claimant's preexisting risk of harm if it is relevant to establish the amount of damages, even if it is also relevant to liability issues that are foreclosed by the judgment or settlement.

Facts and Procedural History

On March 6, 2002, thirty-four-year-old Jeffry Herbst suffered from a fever, congestion, nausea, loss of appetite, and decreased urine output.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dillon v. GloverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Lean v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kovach v. Caligor MidwestIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Virginia E. Alldredge and Julia A. Luker, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Venita Hargis v. The Good Samaritan Home, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Indiana Department of Insurance v. EverhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Robertson v. B.O. ex rel. OrtIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API