Atterholt v. Herbst
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that when a claimant seeks excess damages from the Patient's Compensation Fund after obtaining a judgment or settlement from a health care provider in a medical malpractice case, the Fund may introduce evidence of the claimant's preexisting risk of harm if it is relevant to establish the amount of damages, even if it is also relevant to liability issues that are foreclosed by the judgment or settlement.
Facts and Procedural History
On March 6, 2002, thirty-four-year-old Jeffry Herbst suffered from a fever, congestion, nausea, loss of appetite, and decreased urine output.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Dillon v. GloverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Lean v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kovach v. Caligor MidwestIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Bules v. Marshall CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Virginia E. Alldredge and Julia A. Luker, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Venita Hargis v. The Good Samaritan Home, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Indiana Department of Insurance v. EverhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Robertson v. B.O. ex rel. OrtIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.