Legal Opinion

Cutter v. Herbst

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 2011No. 49A04-1006-PL-343PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellants-Defendants/Cross-Appel-lees, Carol Cutter, Indiana Commissioner of Insurance, as Administrator of the Indiana Patients’ Compensation Fund, and the Indiana Patients’ Compensation Fund (collectively, the Fund), appeal the trial court’s Order on Appellee-Plain-tiff s/Cross-Appellant’s, Geneva Herbst, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffry A. Herbst (the Estate), motion to correct errors, awarding the Estate damages in the amount of $750,000 following a calculation of pre-negligence and post-negligence survival chances.

We affirm.

ISSUE…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mayhue v. SparkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Hawkins v. CannonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Atterholt v. HerbstIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley T. Tucker v. Michelle R. Harrison, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Manley v. ShererIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. John Green v. Stephen Robertson, Commissioner, Indiana Department of InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Cutter v. HerbstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API