Legal Opinion

Hill v. . Board of Aldermen of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1875PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Civil action, for damage, tried before his Honor, Judge Schenek, upon the complaint and demurrer at Fall Term, 1874, of the Superior Court of Mecklenburg county. The defendants demurred to the complaint of the plaintiff, and on the hearing, his Honor overruled the demurrer. From this judgment defendants appealed. All the facts pertinent to the points raised and decided in this court, are stated in the opinion of Justice Rodman.

1Opinion of the Court

The complaint alleges that the defendant is a corporation authorized "to make all ordinances, rules and regulations for the good government, health and safety of the property and persons in said city, not inconsistent with the laws of the State or of the United States, and to impose penalties for the breaking or infringement of any laws or ordinances by them established." That in pursuance of this authority the authorities of the city in 1871, adopted an ordinance which prohibited all persons from firing guns or pistols, or exploding any squibs or fire crackers within the limits of the city,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Mayor of New YorkCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Kelley v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Bunch v. Town of EdentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Jones v. City of WilliamsburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API