Legal Opinion

Peery v. Hanley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 21, 1995No. 9111-07301; CA A79358PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

In this action to recover for intentional infliction of emotional distress and sexual harassment, defendant 1 appeals from a judgment incorporating a jury verdict that awarded plaintiff $20,000 in noneconomic damages and $120,000 in punitive damages. We address only the issues of whether plaintiff was required to offer medical testimony to establish a causal connection between defendant’s actions and plaintiffs symptoms, and whether the jury’s punitive damages award must be set aside on the ground that it impermissibly punishes free expression. We affirm.

Defendant is an orthopedic surgeon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Oregon Beauty Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rockhill v. PollardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Huffman and Wright Logging Co. v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Scholes v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. WillbanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Pinkerton v. Tri-County Metropolitan Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Peery v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API