Legal Opinion

Peery v. Hanley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1995No. 9111-07301; CA A79358PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Defendant Hanley seeks reconsideration of our opinion in Peery v. Hanley, 135 Or App 162, 897 P2d 1189 (1995). He takes issue with the following sentence: “The jury found that defendant had sexually harassed plaintiff and had intentionally inflicted emotional distress.” Id. at 164-65. Defendant acknowledges that that sentence is correct, but contends that it “creates an inaccurate impression.” He points out that although the jury found for plaintiff on her sexual harassment claim, the trial court entered a judgment notwithstanding the verdict on that claim, ORCP 63, on the ground that there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Peery v. HanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API