Legal Opinion

Bancard Services, Inc. v. E Trade Access, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 30, 2003No. 01-1741-HUPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARSH, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubei filed Findings and Recommendation (# 57) on November 4, 2002. After reviewing his Findings and Recommendation, I was concerned that the issues of justiciability and standing were not addressed. On January 10, 2003, I recommitted the matter to Judge Hubei to address these issues in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Judge Hubei filed a second Findings and Recommendation (# 70) on March 28, 2003, and found that there is a justiciable case or controversy, and that plaintiffs have standing to proceed with their claims.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Nordisk Systems, Inc. v. Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  3. Bryant v. American Seafoods Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Bryant v. American Seafoods Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API